Overview
Featured Article
Cushieri A, Lezoche E, Morino, M et al: E.A.E.S. Multicentre prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999;13:952-957
Expert Reviews

Methodological Reviewer
Jeffrey Barkun MD, MSc, FRCSC, FACS, Department of Surgery, McGill UniversitySupplementary Articles
Guyatt G, Jaeschke R, Heddle N, Cook D, Shannon H, Walter S: Basic Statistics for Clinicians: Interpreting Study Results: Confidence Intervals. Can Med Assoc J 1995;152 (2): 169-173
Questions
Please read the provided articles and be prepared to discuss the following:
- What is the clinical question being addressed?
- Was the assignment of patients to treatment randomized?
- Were all patients who entered the trial properly accounted for and attributed at its conclusions?
- Were patients, their clinicians and study personnel “blind” to treatment?
- Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?
- Aside from the experimental intervention, were the groups treated equally?
- How large and precise was the treatment effect?
- Can the results be applied to my patient care?
- Were all clinically important outcomes considered?
- Are the likely treatment benefits worth the potential harm and costs?
- State the conclusion. Have the authors addressed the question posed?
- Does the evidence support the conclusion?